I'm a long-term buy-and-hold investor. Arguably, the most important part of which is choosing your location. I want to fact-check my current belief and get your opinions, whether they support or go against it. My belief is that the most popular metros that people have historically moved to (NYC, SF, LA, Boston, Miami, DC, etc) will continue to grow and outpace the rest of the country over the long-term. I don't care about the recent migrations to TX, AZ, etc. I'm talking about the ideal locations that people frequently talk about in subreddits like r/samegrassbutgreener. The places that people from overseas know about and want to visit and move to, and the places where the highest density of jobs and skilled workers live. Currently, you can buy a 3BR house in Cleveland, OH for a little over $100k. The same house in Palo Alto, CA would cost around $3M. I don't think that the gap is going to close. In fact, I think that it is going to widen. Why?…