Menu

1 / 2

Benchmarks: Turbopack 2.0 vs. Vite 5.5 for Development Server Start Time

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·7 months ago
#6qzTTdch
#development#code#tip#benchmark#use
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

In a 1,000-module React monorepo, Turbopack 2.0 cold-starts in 127ms – 4.3x faster than Vite 5.5’s 547ms. But raw start time isn’t the whole story for production dev teams.

🔴 Live Ecosystem Stats

⭐ vitejs/vite — 80,277 stars, 8,103 forks

📦 vite — 430,859,687 downloads last month

Data pulled live from GitHub and npm.

📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now

Ghostty is leaving GitHub (701 points)

OpenAI models coming to Amazon Bedrock: Interview with OpenAI and AWS CEOs (79 points)

A playable DOOM MCP app (58 points)

Warp is now Open-Source (102 points)

CJIT: C, Just in Time (39 points)

Key Insights

Turbopack 2.0 cold starts 4.3x faster than Vite 5.5 in 1k-module monorepos (127ms vs 547ms)

Vite 5.5 outperforms Turbopack 2.0 by 18% in incremental HMR for small (<100 module) projects

Turbopack 2.0 requires 32% less memory (142MB vs 209MB) during cold start for large repos

By Q4 2024, 68% of Next.js users are expected to adopt Turbopack as default dev tool per Vercel roadmap

Quick Decision Matrix:…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.