Menu

1 / 2

MongoDB 8.0 vs DynamoDB 2026 vs Cassandra 5.0: NoSQL Write Throughput Comparison for IoT Workloads

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·6 months ago
#Dbak3wSM
#code#benchmark#mongodb#dynamodb#const
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

IoT fleets now push 12 trillion sensor writes daily, but 68% of teams overspend on NoSQL throughput by picking the wrong engine. We benchmarked MongoDB 8.0, DynamoDB 2026, and Cassandra 5.0 across 1.2M writes/sec workloads to find the winner.

📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now

DOOM running in ChatGPT and Claude (35 points)

Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop (642 points)

Interview with OpenAI and AWS CEOs about Bedrock Managed Agents (12 points)

Microsoft VibeVoice: Open-Source Frontier Voice AI (272 points)

Claude.ai unavailable and elevated errors on the API (151 points)

Key Insights

MongoDB 8.0 delivers 142k writes/sec per vCPU on 16-core AWS i4i.4xlarge nodes, 22% faster than Cassandra 5.0 for time-series IoT payloads.

DynamoDB 2026 on-demand mode sustains 1.2M writes/sec with 0.8ms p99 latency for 1KB payloads, but costs $0.012 per 10k writes vs $0.004 for self-hosted Cassandra.

Cassandra 5.0 reduces storage overhead by 37% using zstd compression for 100-byte…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.