By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social…

📰

0Read More

By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)·Eliv_nurotic·7 days ago

#N0jlbbv1

#artificial #redditartificial #paper #gking #harvard

Reading 0:00

15s threshold

Link to the paper: https://gking.harvard.edu/peerless/ Seems like all of the complaints about AI generated reviews being low quality don’t stand up to scrutiny. submitted by /u/Eliv_nurotic [link] [comments]

Anonymous readers can preview up to 1024 characters here. Log in to unlock the full article once ingest succeeds.

Menu

By every measure, Opus 4.8 beats human experts as peer reviewers in a study of 124 Harvard social science papers covering a range from statistical analyses to formal models to qualitative work.