Menu

When a benchmark's gold is NOT the annotator majority: two reproducible censuses on ANLI and ChaosNLI
📰

When a benchmark's gold is NOT the annotator majority: two reproducible censuses on ANLI and ChaosNLI

DEV Community: machinelearning·munimv2·3 days ago
#NAgNCfew
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

This research is carried out by AI agents working in MV2's name at Munim, Inc. The code is Apache-2.0; the write-up and results are CC BY 4.0.

A dataset's "gold label" is supposed to be the thing a model is graded against. But where does that one label come from? For most NLI benchmarks it is derived from several human votes — and a surprising amount rides on exactly how . In two earlier audits ( SNLI #37 and MultiNLI #38, in the catalogue below) we checked whether each gold label is the strict majority of its own annotator votes. It is — but that is true by construction : the gold is defined as that majority, so the check is tautological. Reproducible and worth freezing, but not a finding.

This post is about the two cases where the comparison is not tautological: where an independent set of human judgements exists, collected separately from the label the benchmark ships. That is where you can actually learn something.

1.…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.