Menu

Comparing 3 Face Recognition Approaches in Python: Eigenfaces (PCA), LBPH, and DeepFace
📰

Comparing 3 Face Recognition Approaches in Python: Eigenfaces (PCA), LBPH, and DeepFace

DEV Community: machinelearning·Pavan Kumar Sadashiv·1 day ago
#cXaSIPIm
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

Face recognition has evolved significantly—from classical statistical methods like Eigenfaces (PCA) and texture-based descriptors like LBPH (Local Binary Pattern Histograms) to modern deep learning frameworks like DeepFace .

In this post, we will implement and compare all three approaches on a small dataset in Python, test how they hold up against illumination changes (e.g., low lighting), and look at how to run the code effortlessly without running into environment issues.

🧠 Overview of the 3 Approaches

Eigenfaces (PCA-based Representation)

Extracts principal components (eigenvectors) of the face distribution.

Pros: Fast and computationally lightweight.

Cons: Very sensitive to lighting, pose, and requires uniform image sizes.

LBPH (Local Binary Pattern Histograms)

Analyzes local pixel neighborhoods by thresholding surrounding pixels against the center pixel.

Pros: Much more robust to illumination changes than Eigenfaces because it looks at relative local textures rather than global pixel…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.