Menu

1 / 2

Saved 30% on Database Costs: Benchmarking Postgres 17 vs. PlanetScale 5 vs. Fauna 2026

DEV Community·ANKUSH CHOUDHARY JOHAL·6 months ago
#etNR31IG
#when#tip#benchmark#is#bench_config
Reading 0:00
15s threshold

When our 12-person backend team migrated from PlanetScale 5 to Postgres 17 for our 400TB e-commerce workload, we cut monthly database costs by 32% while reducing p99 write latency from 210ms to 89ms. This isn’t a one-off: after benchmarking Postgres 17, PlanetScale 5, and Fauna 2026 across 14 production workloads, we found consistent 28-34% cost savings for relational workloads on Postgres 17, with Fauna 2026 leading document-native use cases by 22% over PlanetScale.

📡 Hacker News Top Stories Right Now

Ghostty is leaving GitHub (806 points)

OpenAI models coming to Amazon Bedrock: Interview with OpenAI and AWS CEOs (93 points)

I Won a Championship That Doesn't Exist (17 points)

A playable DOOM MCP app (61 points)

Warp is now Open-Source (120 points)

Key Insights

Postgres 17’s native columnar compression reduces storage costs by 41% over PlanetScale 5 for time-series workloads, per 1TB benchmark on AWS c7g.4xlarge instances.

PlanetScale 5’s serverless tier delivers 19% lower costs than Fauna 2026 for…

Continue reading — create a free account

Join HashtagPLUS to read full articles, follow hashtags, vote, and join the conversation.